Uncle Tobys a cereal offender

uncle-tobys-1Cereal Partners Australia Pty Ltd (CPA), the manufacturer and distributor of Uncle Tobys brand oats, has paid penalties of $32,400 in relation to alleged misleading representations about the protein content of certain Uncle Tobys brand oats products, following the issue of three infringement notices by the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission ACCC).

The ACCC issued the infringement notices because it had reasonable grounds to believe that CPA made false or misleading representations about the protein content of certain Uncle Tobys brand oats products, in contravention of the Australian Consumer Law (ACL).

The packaging of Uncle Tobys ‘Quick Sachets’ oats contained the statement ‘Natural Source of Protein Superfood’, and the packaging of Uncle Tobys ‘Traditional Oats’ contained the statement ‘Naturally Rich in Protein Superfood’.  The product packaging in each case contained the disclaimer “when prepared with [1/2 or 2/3] cup of skim milk”, which appeared in fine print below the misleading statements.

These representations were also made in a television commercial promoting Uncle Tobys oats products, which contained a similar fine print disclaimer.

The ACCC alleged that by combining the words ‘natural source’ / ‘naturally rich’, ‘protein’ and ‘superfood’ in the statements on the packaging and in a television commercial; and presenting the word ‘protein’ prominently in the centre of the front of the packet in a bright colour and in large font sizes, CPA made false or misleading representations that the oats in these Uncle Tobys products contained a significant amount of protein, when this is not the case.

The ACCC did not consider the disclaimer contained on the packaging and a similar disclaimer in the television commercial was sufficient to correct the dominant impression created by these statements and their presentation.

“Consumers should be able to purchase food products based on accurate health and composition claims. While the ACCC acknowledges that oats have many health benefits, on their own they are not high in protein, contrary to the representations made about these Uncle Tobys products,” Rod Sims, chairman, ACCC, said.

“Business should be aware that a fine print disclaimer is insufficient to correct or qualify a prominent representation on packaging or in advertising that is false or misleading.”

“Truth in advertising, particularly where misleading claims are made by large businesses, is a priority enforcement area for the ACCC,” Sims said.

uncle-tobys-2

 

 

Comments

1 comment

  1. Peter posted on November 26, 2015

    Fines of $32,000 I don't know how they will pay that huge amount, maybe put it on their expense credit card. The ACCC needs to implement a lot harsher penalties relative to the size of the business especially if these companies set out to deceive and clearly if fine print is involved then its pretty well meant too. reply

Comment Manually

I have read and agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Inside FMCG Jobs

Loading...

FMCG Products

Company:

Category:

View details

Latest Poll

Is it OK for retail staff to bend the rules to help customers?
x

SUBSCRIBE
FREE NEWS BRIEFS Get breaking news delivered